Heh. I just wanted to know that someone saw that page at least once. I've always kept my website Lynx-compatible and the last re-design I did I decided to use frames, but I still made that page with a redirect to it if their browser didn't support frames.
Now I'm considering a new re-design just because the current look is a bit dated and doesn't represent my present art skills and fashion sense. Oy.
Hm. Yeah, it does look very 2001y. What-with the rollovers and black backgrounds and tables and lack of external .css file. But Flash or Java? Those are both already dated unless it's used sparingly, or is for animation (Youtube or Weebls-stuff). Go straight to the clean, table-less design, using a single css file for all the formatting.
I dislike CSS because it's not very conducive to being written straight from my head with a text editor. (How I still do all of my HTML code)
Shun the unbeliever! Shuuuuuuunnnn! (Charlie references are good everywhere!)
Seriously, though, css is good because it lets you modularize the design, and on the whole is faster load times. Also, if you haven't checked it out already, I figure you'd get use out of Coda. It's a text editor, terminal, ftp client, web browser (for previews), and reference guide all in one window (using tabs) designed around web development. I don't use it because I shy away from raw HTMLing, but it's gotten good reviews.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 01:15 am (UTC)http://circle.twu.net/noframes.html
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 01:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 07:36 am (UTC)I laughed. Amiga: the undead platform. It roams the earth, neither alive nor dead, eating the processors of the living platforms.
Also: Java sucks more. Flash if you have to, Ajax is less sucky, but I'mma sticking to the noframes version.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 04:02 pm (UTC)Now I'm considering a new re-design just because the current look is a bit dated and doesn't represent my present art skills and fashion sense. Oy.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 06:03 pm (UTC)Could be worse, tho. It could be all in pink.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 06:09 pm (UTC)Also, I was thinking about making my site somewhat interactive with some low-bandwidth animation and time-waster type stuff on the main page.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-24 08:04 pm (UTC)Shun the unbeliever! Shuuuuuuunnnn!
(Charlie references are good everywhere!)
Seriously, though, css is good because it lets you modularize the design, and on the whole is faster load times. Also, if you haven't checked it out already, I figure you'd get use out of Coda. It's a text editor, terminal, ftp client, web browser (for previews), and reference guide all in one window (using tabs) designed around web development. I don't use it because I shy away from raw HTMLing, but it's gotten good reviews.